Chronicle Issues
  Research Review Issues
  CFIDSLink
E-newsletter
  Reprint Policies
RETURN TO TABLE OF CONTENTS
Fall 2000

Treating Pediatric CFS

By David S. Bell, MD, FAAP,
Chief, Department of Pediatrics,
Medina Hospital, Medina, New York

Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is widely recognized in adults, but it is not as well known that children and adolescents can have the illness. CFS has been found in children as young as age five. An Australian study reported 5.5 CFS cases per 100,000 children up to age 9 and 47.9 per 100,000 ages 10-19.1

Early practical intervention for pediatric CFS is well within the training and ability of primary care physicians; however, the illness can and often does present differently in children than in adults and it can be difficult to diagnose.

Symptoms
There appear to be two onset patterns of pediatric CFS: gradual, or insidious, onset of symptoms, usually in children 5 to 12 years of age, and acute onset of symptoms, more common with cases beginning in adolescence.

As in adult CFS, symptoms may include sore throat, joint pain, migraines, irritable bowel syndrome, post-exertional malaise, sleep disorders, photosensitivity and impaired concentration and memory. Symptoms of CFS in young children most often has its onset with headache or irritable bowel syndrome.

The cognitive disturbances in CFS can produce reduced concentration, short-term memory loss and confusion and may be confused with attention deficit disorder in children. These symptoms may be hard to recognize because children do not have as much experience as adults in judging their own cognitive abilities.

Pediatric CFS patients will often have numerous symptoms at equally severe levels, but the symptoms will migrate. For example, a child may complain of sore throat and headache, followed the next day by lymph node and abdominal pain. By recording the symptoms during office visits, an overall pattern can be established.

However, establishing a pattern may be complicated by the fact that children sometimes have difficulty recog-nizing changes in energy and very young children in particular are unable to verbalize what they are experiencing. Some children with CFS do not perceive themselves as being ill because they have no clear reference for normal health.

Diagnosis
The diagnosis of CFS is entirely clinical: a characteristic pattern of somatic symptoms (see CDC case definition on the back of all RR issues) dominated by unexplained fatigue limiting normal activity. Laboratory testing should be used to exclude other possible causes for the symptoms, but by far the most effective tool to use when CFS is suspected is an activity scale or daily diary that measures a child’s overall normal activity levels.

A child with CFS will have substantially reduced activity levels, but may appear to others to have a normal activity level. For example, a child with CFS may be able to participate in sporting activities on the weekend (i.e., playing in a soccer game), giving the appearance that she is healthy. On closer examination, however, the child with CFS who participated in the soccer game would have to rest for the remainder of the day and usually the next day.

School attendance is the most important indicator of both severity and prognosis of pediatric CFS. If the CFS symptoms are mild, the child can make it through a full day of school, perhaps even with gym class, but will have increased fatigue and may need to rest often. Moderate CFS permits part-time school without gym or sports and requires the child to get extra rest every evening.

With severe forms of CFS, school attendance may not be possible, and home tutoring should be used to maintain an appropriate grade level.

Comparing the child’s activity levels on weekends and during the summer to their activity during the school week is also important. Children often report that they feel better in the summer, which is often considered an indication of school phobia. However, it may actually be because fewer sustained activities are required.

Measuring activity levels helps to rule out school phobia or depression. Depressed children do not feel overly tired and weak. A child with CFS will be just as inactive on the weekend as during the school week or may actually maintain less activity during unrestricted times.

Treatment
In longitudinal studies, 8% to 47% of children with CFS become well; 27% to 46% improve; 12% to 29% remain unchanged and 6% to 17% become worse on follow-up evaluation.2

In pediatric CFS, it is important to develop long-term treatment plans that address all issues, including maximizing the child’s activity levels, alleviating anxiety and maintaining grade-level school work.

Children with CFS who cannot attend school or have reduced participation in school activities are missing important developmental opportunities and should be encouraged to combine social contact with exercise or play whenever they are physically able.

The pediatric patient’s fears should also be addressed. Children with CFS may believe that they have AIDS or cancer or that they are dying. They may also fear that any increased activity level will worsen their condition, causing them to avoid social and other activities important to their development. Putting these fears to rest can help children better cope with their illness.

For more severe CFS patients who cannot remain upright for more than 4 hours in a 24-hour period, it is important that they learn
coping skills for school and social activities.

Although pharmacologic therapy may help with the symptoms of the illness, there is no evidence it shortens the overall course of the illness. Health care practitioners should be aware that children with CFS often have unusual responses to medications, so low dosages should be tried first and gradually increased as appropriate.

If the child experiences difficulty initiating or maintaining sleep, small doses of antihistamines may help. More severe cases might require low doses of tricylic antidepressants3. For headache pain, a mild analgesic such as acetaminophen or ibuprofen can also be effective.

There is increasing evidence that orthostatic intolerance (OI) plays a role in adult CFS, and this area is being studied in children. Research shows that OI may be more common in children with CFS than in adults with CFS. Symptoms of light-headedness and postural syncope in children can often be managed by increasing daily water and salt intake. In adolescents, mineral corticosteroids and beta-blockers can be effective 4.

Fatigue, which can be associated with reduced serotonin states, may be helped with selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors (SSRIs) such as fluoxetine (Prozac) and sertraline (Zoloft).

Case management
Pediatric CFS is often mistaken for school phobia, anxiety disorder or depression. Failure to make a proper diagnosis can lead to isolation, insecurity and family stress for the child. Examining the child’s school attendance and activity levels, as well as establishing a symptom pattern through office visits, can help diagnose CFS.

Validating the illness, providing symptomatic relief and encouraging graded increases in activity are the most prudent paths to managing the illness.3 Because many of the symptoms of CFS are present early in other disease states, periodic diagnostic reevaluation is essential.

As in other chronic illnesses, the physician is often called upon to act as patient advocate, managing both medical and psychosocial issues, and providing information and education to the patient, family and school personnel. Physician support during all phases of pediatric CFS will allow greater compliance with treatment suggestions.

References

  1. Lloyd A et al. Prevalence of chronic fatigue syndrome in an Australian population. Med J Aust. 1990;153: 522-528.
  2. Bell D. Chronic fatigue syndrome in children and adolescents: a review. Focus & Opinion: Peds. 1995;1: 412-420.
  3. Lapp C. Management of chronic fatigue in children: a practicing clinicians approach. J CFS. 1997; 3:59-76.
  4. Stein M. Twelve-year-old-girl with chronic fatigue; school absence, and fluctuating symptoms. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 1998;19: 196-201.